Skip to main content

[jsr362-experts:] Re: Resource proposal

  • From: Kito Mann < >
  • To: Edward Burns < >
  • Cc: " " < >
  • Subject: [jsr362-experts:] Re: Resource proposal
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:22:45 -0500

FYI, I went ahead and created this as an issue for the JSF spec:
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1252.

___

Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com ;| JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com ;| @jsfcentral
+1 203-998-0403

* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://w
<http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>ww.enterprisejavanews.com
<http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
* JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
* Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Edward Burns 
< >wrote:

> >>>>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:36:41 -0500, Neil Griffin <
>  >
>  said:
>
> NG> @Ed Burns: When you get a chance, could you please shed some light
> NG> on why resource dependencies can only be done via JSF annotations,
> NG> and not by faces-config.xml? Thx.
>
> I suppose it could be.  It turned out to be easier to implement with
> annotations.  I think you have discovered a wrinkle where our stated
> goal of having complete parity of functionality between annotations and
> XML is not met.
>
> Ed
>


[jsr362-experts:] Re: Resource proposal

Kito Mann 01/14/2014

[jsr362-experts:] Re: Resource proposal

Werner Keil 01/14/2014
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close