Skip to main content

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

  • From: Edward Burns < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml
  • Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:15:17 -0700
  • List-id: <jsr362-experts.portletspec3.java.net>

>>>>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 10:06:18 -0700, David S Taylor 
>>>>> < >
>>>>>  said:

DT> I just checked out portletspec3 from github. Looking at the pom.xml:
DT> <dependencies>
DT>     <dependency>
DT>       <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId>
DT>       <artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId>
DT>       <version>2.4</version>
DT>       <scope>provided</scope>
DT>     </dependency>
DT>   </dependencies>

DT> Do we want to consider version 3.0 or even 3.1 [1] of the servlet api...

This is a fundamental question.  What minimim level of dependent
technologies do we depend on?  Servlet-wise, I think 3.0 is as high as
we want to go because we want people to be able to run on EE6 level
containers.

Ed


[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] pom.xml

David S Taylor 08/03/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Martin Scott Nicklous 08/04/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Edward Burns 08/07/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Werner Keil 08/07/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Neil Griffin 08/07/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Werner Keil 08/07/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Werner Keil 08/07/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Martin Scott Nicklous 08/08/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Werner Keil 08/08/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Martin Scott Nicklous 08/08/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Werner Keil 08/08/2013

[jsr362-observers:] [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml

Martin Scott Nicklous 08/08/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close