Skip to main content

Re: SIP Servlet POJOs.

  • From: Binod < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: SIP Servlet POJOs.
  • Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:15:26 +0530

Hi Tom,

On Tuesday 05 February 2013 06:57 PM, Strickland, Tom wrote:
" type="cite">Typo: @AnyResponse - the end is 299, but I think that you mean it to be 999.

Yes. It should have been 999.

" type="cite">
Question: Perhaps I've missed it, but does this define what happens when an attempt is made to deploy a SipServlet POJO that does not cover all possible methods and response codes?

If a POJO does not handle a method or response, the behavior
should just be the same as what happens when a usual SIP Servlet
does not handle such a message, right?

For example initial requests that are not handled by the application
are responded with 501. For others, the default behavior of proxy/UA
could come to effect.


" type="cite">


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Binod < "> >
Date: 5 February 2013 11:24
Subject: SIP Servlet POJOs.
To: ">

Hi All,

Please find my working draft on SIP Servlet POJO design attached.
Comments welcome. We can discuss this in tomorrow's meeting.


Tom Strickland, Software Developer, Thrupoint Software. Tel: +44 (0) 2920 005110
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and 
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Thrupoint, Inc.

SIP Servlet POJOs.

Binod 02/05/2013

Re: SIP Servlet POJOs.

Strickland, Tom 02/05/2013

Re: SIP Servlet POJOs.

Binod 02/05/2013
Please Confirm