Re: isInternalSipURI method
- From: Keith Lewis <
- To: jsr359-experts <
- Subject: Re: isInternalSipURI method
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:36:34 +0000
Some explanation regarding my objections to SipURI.isInternal()
On 27 February 2014 13:43, Binod PG
> I prefer SIPURI.isInternal as well.
> I will let Keith explain why inInternal should not be in SIPURI. I might
> be misrepresenting his concerns.
> - Binod.
> ------ Original message ------
> *From: *Eric Cheung
> *Date: *27/02/2014 19:05
> *Subject:*Re: isInternalSipURI method
> I vote for SipURI.isInternal().
> I am not sure why you wrote this method does not represent the content
> of the SipURI. Doesn't the value returned depend on the host, port, and
> maybe maddr fields of the SipURI?
> On 2/27/14 5:54 AM, Binod wrote:
> > In the AR proposal, Keith has a suggestion to add a method to check
> > a SIP URI is addressed to the container. After yesterday's discussion,
> > we came down
> > to two options for this API. Would like to know EG's preference on one
> > way or other.
> > 1. SipFactory.isInternalSipURI(SipURI uri) : Note that SipFactory is a
> > factory class and
> > all other the methods are createXXX. This method does not do a factory
> > operation.
> > 2. SipURI.isInternal() : Note that unlike other methods in the SipURI
> > this method does not
> > represent the content of the SipURI.
> > thanks,
> > Binod.
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you. CafeX Communications.