[jsr356-experts] Re: For Review: v002 API and example code
- From: Remy Maucherat <
- Subject: [jsr356-experts] Re: For Review: v002 API and example code
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:30:38 +0200
- Organization: Red Hat Inc
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 18:13 -0700, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Without streams, it's not a serious proposal.
> Chunking/framing is a low-level implementation/protocol detail related
> to implementation buffering; it's not visible at the API-level. The
> fact that the draft introduces an iterator to simulate a stream should
> by itself be an indication that something is wrong.
I have to agree not putting in possible asynchronous stream capability
in favor of that blocking stream "simulation" is not a good idea.
Essentially, it would enforce a message size limitation on input (or
else the application will not scale as well).
Red Hat Inc