It looks like the APIs for send* and onMessage* are defined to use byte arrays. Can we use ByteBuffers instead of byte in these APIs? The reason being is that byte are always allocated from heap memory, but ByteBuffers can either be allocated, under the user's control, as nonDirect (heap memory) or Direct (native memory). Sometimes it is advantageous for the user to be using native memory and at least they should be given the flexibility to do so. byte can be wrapped into ByteBuffers and retrieved from ByteBuffers easily, so users can work with byte if they want to.
IBM Research Triangle Park
[jsr356-experts] Re: ByteBuffers versus Byte Arrays