Skip to main content

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

  • From: Arun Gupta < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement
  • Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:41:08 -0800
  • Organization: Oracle

Danny,

cil
" type="cite">
" type="cite"> IMHO the names are intuitive and its only 5 classes. I'd rather keep a flat structure with everything in javax.websocket.* package.
OK. Well we are balancing the need not to require server API classes for rich clients, which really pulls us in the direction of needing a separate package to make the separation between the models clean.
Do you expect two separate JARs for client and server or rich clients to extract the required classes out of a single JAR ?

Arun
" type="cite">
We may well have more server specific classes in future releases too !

- Danny




-- 
http://twitter.com/arungupta
http://blogs.oracle.com/arungupta


[jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Danny Coward 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Mark Thomas 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Arun Gupta 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Danny Coward 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Arun Gupta 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Danny Coward 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] Re: [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Arun Gupta 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Danny Coward 12/12/2012

[jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] Re: Package naming and arrangement

Mark Thomas 12/12/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close